Pillar: Food, Bioeconomy Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment
Opening Date:
Deadline: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:00:00 (Brussels local time)
Modification Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024
Latest information:
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION results
Deadline: 22/02/2024
Available budget:
Topic ID | Topic short name | Types of action | Budget (EUR M) |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-01-1
| Demonstrating how regions can operate within safe ecological and regional nitrogen and phosphorus boundaries | HORIZON-IA | 27,00 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-01-2
| Best available techniques to recover or recycle fertilising products from secondary raw materials | HORIZON-CSA | 4,00 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-01-3
| Environmental impacts of food systems | HORIZON-RIA | 7,00 |
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
Topic ID | Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | Number of inadmissible proposals | Number of ineligible proposals | Number of above-threshold proposals |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-01-1 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-01-2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-01-3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Summary of observer report:
This summary report describes the observers´ assessment of the evaluation of the single stage proposals of the following calls: HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-01, HORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-01 and HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-01. The observers analysed the efficiency of the procedures, usability of the instruments (including IT tools), conduct and fairness of the evaluation sessions, and compliance with the applicable rules. Overall, 185 independent expert evaluators were assigned to this evaluation. The fully remote individual evaluation by independent experts followed by consensus meetings was observed to be both efficient and appropriate. The briefings and the material sent to experts beforehand was found excellent. In general, the consensus was well reached during consensus meetings. All the proposals were evaluated and treated according to the EU Commission rules and guidelines. The highest degree of confidentiality was maintained. The evaluation was conducted in full conformity with the published procedures and according to the applicable rules. The compliance with the rules was systematically emphasised during all stages of evaluation. The significance of confidentiality and the conflict of interest were highlighted in several stages of the evaluation. No deviations from these rules and procedures were observed. In general, the entire evaluation was very well organised and executed, and there were no issues which would require major adjustments. The process was observed to be transparent and fair, and the final scoring and ranking properly reflected the value of the proposals. We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
Author: Programmes & Funding Calls (Source: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-search;programCode=HORIZON;callCode=HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-01)